- Inspection contingencies in New Hampshire contracts are designed for major unforeseen defects, not routine maintenance items or disclosed conditions
- Clear communication with buyer's agents before contract signing protects sellers from unrealistic renegotiation attempts after inspection
- Strategic contingency language, including dollar thresholds for repair requests, can prevent deals from falling apart over minor issues
Brie Stephens leads Lake Life Realty at Compass, the top-performing lakefront real estate team in New Hampshire's Lakes Region. In her years closing lakefront deals, she's seen the same scenario play out repeatedly: a seller accepts an offer, the property goes under contract, and then the inspection report triggers a list of repair demands that have nothing to do with the actual purpose of the contingency.
In New Hampshire, inspection contingencies exist specifically for major unforeseen material defects, typically safety-related issues that couldn't have been discovered without professional expertise. The problem? Not every agent communicates this clearly to their clients, and some buyers enter the inspection period, treating it as a second negotiation phase.
The distinction matters enormously for lakefront sellers. A loose gutter, a leaky faucet, or a toilet seal that needs replacement don't qualify as major unforeseen defects. These are maintenance items. They're visible. They don't change the fundamental value or safety of the property.
Brie tells both buyer and seller clients the same story about what rises to the level of acceptable inspection renegotiation. A major electrical issue that poses a legitimate safety concern and couldn't have been seen without an inspector's trained eye qualifies. Discovering that a laundry vent has been exhausting directly into an inaccessible attic space, creating a hidden mold problem, qualifies.
Septic systems present another category where major unforeseen issues legitimately surface. If an inspection reveals that a leach field has been driven over repeatedly and needs complete replacement, that represents a substantial change in property value. These situations warrant conversation between buyer and seller about remediation or concessions.
The key word is unforeseen. Lake Life Realty specializes in luxury waterfront properties on Lake Winnipesaukee and throughout the NH Lakes Region, and every transaction includes a property disclosure form. Sellers document the ages of major systems, note any known issues, and point out visible problems like rotted trim around a lakeside slider door.
Buyers sign off on this disclosure when they sign the purchase and sales agreement. They acknowledge they've been made aware of these conditions. Once disclosed and acknowledged, these items are by definition not unforeseen. Asking for credits or repairs on disclosed conditions defeats the entire purpose of the disclosure process.
Brie doesn't assume the buyer's agent is having the right conversation with their client about inspection expectations. Even experienced agents sometimes let buyers enter the inspection period with unrealistic ideas about what they can renegotiate.
As a seller's agent, her approach is proactive. She verbalizes expectations directly with the buyer's agent before contract signing, making sure they understand that inspection remedies apply only to major unforeseen issues. This protects her seller clients from having their property return to market after going under contract, which inevitably raises questions among other potential buyers about what went wrong.
In competitive situations, she sometimes includes specific language in the purchase and sales agreement establishing a dollar threshold. The clause might read that buyers will only request renegotiation if inspection issues exceed $5,000 or $10,000 in repair costs, whether as a single item or cumulative total. In multiple offer scenarios, this strategy can make a buyer's offer more attractive while still protecting them from genuinely significant problems.
A recent transaction illustrated exactly why these conversations matter. After inspection, the buyers came back requesting credits because the water heater was near the end of its useful life, the heating system was aging, and the oil tank showed wear.
None of these qualified as major unforeseen defects. Systems have lifespans. Their ages were disclosed. Nothing had failed or posed an immediate safety risk. This was an attempt to use inspection as leverage for a price reduction based on eventual replacement costs for aging but functional equipment.
Brie Stephens was named to NAR's 30 Under 30 and has closed over $128 million in lakefront property sales. That volume comes partly from protecting her clients on both sides of transactions. Setting clear expectations before contract signing prevents these situations from derailing deals or forcing sellers back to market after weeks under contract.
As she puts it: Inspections aren't meant for nitpicking. They're meant for discovering the problems you genuinely couldn't have known were there.
What qualifies as a major unforeseen defect in a New Hampshire real estate inspection?
Major unforeseen defects are safety-related issues or structural problems that couldn't have been discovered without professional inspection, such as hidden electrical hazards, concealed mold from improper venting, or failed septic systems. Normal wear and tear, aging systems still functioning properly, and any conditions disclosed by the seller don't qualify.
Can buyers ask for repairs on items listed in the property disclosure?
No. When buyers sign the purchase and sales agreement, they also sign off on the property disclosure, acknowledging they're aware of disclosed conditions and system ages. Since these items are no longer unforeseen, they don't provide grounds for renegotiation during the inspection period.
How can sellers protect themselves from unrealistic inspection demands?
Work with an agent who proactively communicates inspection contingency limitations to the buyer's agent before contract signing. Consider including specific language in the purchase and sales agreement that establishes a dollar threshold for repair requests, ensuring that only genuinely significant issues become grounds for renegotiation.